作业帮 > 英语 > 作业

求逻辑学英文翻译请翻译以下文本.感谢!One type of inductive argument concludes

来源:学生作业帮 编辑:神马作文网作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/10/10 08:18:30
求逻辑学英文翻译
请翻译以下文本.感谢!
One type of inductive argument concludes with a hypothesis that one thing causes another. This conclusion has the form, “x causes y.” Suppose I sneak up on a little girl who is solemnly reading {War and Peace.} Suppose, further, that I tickle her without mercy, and that she immediately begins to giggle, and giggles all the while. If I conclude that “the tickling causes the giggling,” then I am implying three things.
1. X OCCURS EARLIER THAN Y. The tickle comes first, the giggle second.
NOTE: We must be careful not to assume that just because x happens earlier than y, x causes y. To do so is to commit the fallacy of Post Hoc E,go Propter Hoc. If, for instance, I’ve had a chronic cough which cleared up on the day that the space shuttle was launched. It would be a mistake to assume that the launch cured my cough.
2. X IS A SUFFICIENT CONDITION FOR Y. Tickling the little girl was all I had to do to make her giggle. And when I did tickle her she giggled.
3. X IS A NECESSARY CONDITION FOR Y. In cases like this, tickling is necessary for the giggling to occur.
求逻辑学英文翻译请翻译以下文本.感谢!One type of inductive argument concludes
有一种归纳论证方法,它可以由一个动作导致另一个动作的发生而得出结论
结论的公式为“X导致了Y”假设我偷偷观察一个正在看《战争与和平》的女孩,并
悄悄地使劲挠她痒痒,她立刻会发笑,笑个不停.如果得出结论“挠痒导致发笑”,那么
就意味着以下3个结论:
1.X的发生早于Y.挠痒先这个动作发生,笑这个动作随后发生.
注意:认为“X导致了Y”,仅仅是因为“X发生在先,Y发生在后”是错误的.不可以犯 Post Hoc E,go Propter Hoc
的错误.比如:宇宙飞船发射的那天,折磨我长期的咳嗽终于痊愈了;.推断飞船的发射是我咳凑痊愈的原因是
错误的
2.X是Y的充分条件.挠痒是我让她发笑所必须做的,且挠痒后她笑的
3.X是Y的必要条件.理由同上,挠痒对于发笑来说是必须发生的动作