谁能帮我写一篇英语演讲 三分钟左右 为什么上大学

谁能帮我写一篇英语演讲 三分钟左右 为什么上大学
要求 演讲长度三分钟左右 态度要端正 内容积极向上 ...

Selections from Chinese Homosexual Literature
Traditional history has sought to undertand past and present societies with categories of analysis such as politics,thought,economics.In the past twenty or so years other categories of analysis,not considered important in the past,have appeared as significant to many historians.Perhaps the most important of these is gender.
To these historians Gender is the cultural meaning given to the rather limited facts of biology.One aspect of gender analysis consists in looking at how "men" and "women","masculinity" and "feminity",are understood in a society - and at how such understandsings play out in people's lives.Another,even newer,aspect of gender analysis looks at issues of sexual behavior and sexuality.In attempting to define the boundaries of subject it is often useful to look at the limits of social life - at where the lines are drawn .For this reason to understand heterosexual as well as homosexual behavior it is important to examine how a culture views homosexual behavior.
It was a Western medievalist,John Boswell,who legitimated lesbian and gay history as a field of study,and ended an older "great homosexuals of history" tradition.Although many people disagreed with his conclusions,he did demonstrate that a significant amount of source material existed.Since his book Christianity,Social Tolerance and Homosexuality (1980) it has become increasingly clear that the study of sexuality in the past is not only possible,but is also an essential component of a full understanding of past and present societies.Brett Hinsch,from whose work the selection here is taken,has begun,for English speakers,the process of understanding the history of sexuality in China,although he is heavily dependent on recent work done by Chinese scholars.
Boswell is most famous for advancing the notion that "Gay people" have always and everywhere existed.Since 1980,however,a very different theory the history of sexuality,has come to be accepted by the majority of historians working in the field.The model now is this:
Homosexual behaviors exist in most societies,and in most,including European society until about 1700,homosexuality falls into two main patterns (at least for men.) One pattern is based on age-dissonant sexual dominance; an older man (not always very much older by the way) will take a conventionally "male" role in a sexual relationship with a younger male,but will not,in doing so,be regarded as any different from other "male" men in general society.The second common pattern is based on gender-dissonant sexual dominance; this means that in a number of societies there were "biological" males who lived as "non-males" throughout their lives,and these people can also be the sexual partners of "male" men without the "men" loosing any status.The Native American berdache is perhaps the most famous example of a widespread phenomenon.
Around 1700,in Western Europe a change took place.A subculture of effeminate men arose in major cities,men who identified themselves as different.The word "molly" was used in London and other words elsewhere.Although they were prepared to have sex with "male" men these "mollies" were also prepared to have sex with each other.This is not,it seems,common across various societies.Some historians have called this the emergence of a "third gender".
Since "a third gender" is not the model of modern homosexuality in the West,there has been a questionof when the "modern homosexual" emerged.Most writers have argued that that the medicalization of homosexuality in the late 19th century resulted in the creation of a new creature - the "modern homosexual" (and the "modern heterosexual"!) What distinguishes "homo-" and "heterosexuals" from earlier models of sexuality is that they are in strict opposition to each other,and are defined not by gender role,or even sexual role,but by "sexual orientation".A major recent readjustment of this theory,resulting from the work of George Chauncey in his recent Gay New York.Chauncey has called into question the last part of the traditional formulation.
He argues that elite terminology and labels (also known as "medicalization") had no immediate effect on the mass of working class New Yorkers (with the suggestion that this was probably true elswhere.) That although there were,eventually,some self-identified "queers",until as late 1940 [!] it was common for working-class men to have "male role" sex with other men ["fairies"] without in any way feeling that they were "homosexual".What happened around 1940,the Chauncey-amended model says is that,first,more and more of the mass of the population began to identify as "heterosexual" and see any homosexual behavior as transgressive; and secondly among self-identified "queers" a shift in desired sexual partner took place.Previously "queers" had tended to prefer "male" men but now "queers" began to prefer other "queers" as sexual partners.
As you can see current discussion amongst historians focuses on Western sexual history.It would also seem to imply that there were no "homosexuals",or "heterosexuals" in the past nor in other cultures [there was of course always homo and heterosexual behavior].In reading the various texts on Chinese homosexual behavior gathered and translated by Hinsch you might consider if the model above applies to the Chinese past?How can we come to understand what their sexual behavior meant to the men discussed?What limitations do the texts impose on our abilities to understand?
Discussion of homosexual behavior in Chinese literature referred back to three classic tales of love from the Zhou period,the Story of Mizi Xia,the Story of Pan Zhang,and the Story of Lord Long Yang.
The Story of Mizi Xia
as recorded in the Legalist philosophical work,the Han Fei Zi [Hinsch p.20-21- from Burton Watson,trans,Han Fei Tzu:Basic Writings,(New York:Columbia University Press,1964),78-79)
In ancient times Mizi Xia won favor [chang] with the ruler of Wei.According to the laws of the state of Wei,anyone who secretly made use of the ruler's carriage was punished by having his feet amputated.When Mizi Xia's mother fell ill,someone slipped into the palace at night to report this to Mizi Xia.Mizi Xia forged an order from the ruler,got into the ruler's carriage,and went to see her,but when the ruler heard of it,he only praised him,saying,"How filial!For the sake ofhis mother he forgot all about the danger of having his feet cut off!" Another day Mizi Xia was strolling with the ruler in an orchard and,biting into a peach and finding it sweet,he stopped eating and gave the remaining half to the ruler to enjoy."How sincere is your love for me!" exclaimed the ruler."You forgot your own appetite and think only of giving me good things to eat!" Later,however,when Mizi Xia's looks had faded and the ruler's passion for him had cooled,he was accused at committing some crime against his lord."After all," said the ruler,"he once stole my carriage,and another time he gave me a half-eaten peach to eat!" Mizi Xia was acting no diffrently from the way he always had; the fact that he was praised in the early days and accused of crime later on,was because the ruler's love had turned hate.
If you gain the ruler's 1ove,your wisdom will be appreciated; you will engoy his favor as well; but if he hates you,not only will your wisdom be rejected,but you will be regarded as a criminal and thrust aside.The beast called the dragon can be tamed and trained to the point where you may ride on its back.But on the underside of its throat it has scales a foot in diameter that curl back from the body,and anyone who chances to brush against them is sure to die.The ruler of men too has his bristling scales."