血泪感激!路过大神帮我翻译一段英文文献,是有关国际关系的~~~ 跪谢跪谢!

血泪感激!路过大神帮我翻译一段英文文献,是有关国际关系的~~~ 跪谢跪谢!
The primacy of liberal theory in such multicausal explanations may appearto be
an abstract admonition, yet precisely this two-stage approach hascharacterized liberal
theory and practice from Kant's philosophy to the practical calculationsby the
American architects of the post-World War I1 settlement. Throughout,multicausal or two-stage liberalism makes sense of what have long beenconsidered contradictions
and ambiguities in classic liberal thought and modern liberal statecraft.
Consider Wilson's proposal for the League of Nations, often cited as the epitome
of liberal "legalism" and "utopianism." At firstglance, Wilson'sproposal seems to
reflect a naive confidence in international institutions. Understood as animplicit
social science theory, not ideology, we see that it was neither utopiannor fundamentally
institutionalist. It rested instead on a pragmatic two-stage liberal view,and its
failure actually conjirms liberal predictions.
From the start, Wilsonwas skeptical about the autonomous influence of international
institutions. He cared little about their precise form, because he viewedthem
as no more than "a symbolic affirmation of the 'rightness' ofdemocracies in their
mutual relations."119 Thus, for example, his initial draft of theCovenant included no
provisions for international law or a supranational court;

至高无上的自由主义理论在这种多因素的解释可能显示
一个抽象的警告,然而正是这两阶段的方法为特点的自由
理论和实践从康德的哲学计算实际的
次世界大战的美国建筑师的结算.自始至终,多种因素的或两级自由主义的意义早已被认为是矛盾
经典的自由主义思想和模糊之处和现代自由主义治国之道.
考虑威尔逊的国际联盟的建议,常常被作为典范
自由主义的“法家”和“乌托邦思想.“乍一看,威尔逊的提议似乎
反映了一个天真的自信在国际机构.理解为隐式
社会科学理论,而不是意识形态,我们看到,它最高的根本
的制式主义.它在一个务实的两级休息而不是自由主义观点,和它的
失败其实证实自由的预测.
从一开始,威尔逊怀疑自主影响国际
机构.他毫不在意他们的精确形式,因为他认为他们
因为没有超过“一个象征性的“对”肯定德·莫拉属于他们
相互关系.“119因此,例如,他最初的契约草案中并没有
国际法律规定或一个超国家的法院;
·······························································································································
差不多了·························································