神马作文网谁能帮忙翻译下东西啊!感激不尽啊!谢谢!
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：神马作文网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/11/11 13:31:37
谁能帮忙翻译下东西啊!感激不尽啊!谢谢!
All the responses to the questions were statistically analysed for significant differences between the groups:type of organisation (contractor, consultant, owner and developer), turnover, years spent in the engineering/construction industry, personal risk tolerance and organisational risk tolerance. There being 62 questions involved, the usual the significant level of P=0.05 was thought to be overly stringent (with 60 questions, the expected number of type II errors is 3). The value of P=0.01 was therefore chosen for the significance criterion.
A weighted average score (WAS) is used. This is calculated by summing the product of response rating and the corresponding number of responses and dividing this figure by the total number of responses.
Arequ est for respondents to nominate the most beneficial risk management training produced only 11 responses comprising:
\1 In house training (five responses)
\1 Experience (three responses)
\1 MBA(one response)
\1 Feasibility analysis (one response)
\1 Institute of planning supervisors, Scotland(1 response)
One contractor stated that they ‘did not find formal training all that useful’.
All the responses to the questions were statistically analysed for significant differences between the groups:type of organisation (contractor, consultant, owner and developer), turnover, years spent in the engineering/construction industry, personal risk tolerance and organisational risk tolerance. There being 62 questions involved, the usual the significant level of P=0.05 was thought to be overly stringent (with 60 questions, the expected number of type II errors is 3). The value of P=0.01 was therefore chosen for the significance criterion.
A weighted average score (WAS) is used. This is calculated by summing the product of response rating and the corresponding number of responses and dividing this figure by the total number of responses.
Arequ est for respondents to nominate the most beneficial risk management training produced only 11 responses comprising:
\1 In house training (five responses)
\1 Experience (three responses)
\1 MBA(one response)
\1 Feasibility analysis (one response)
\1 Institute of planning supervisors, Scotland(1 response)
One contractor stated that they ‘did not find formal training all that useful’.
所有的反应,问题是统计上的显着差异的群体分析：组织的类型（承包商,顾问,业主和开发商）,营业额,年花费在工程/建筑行业,个人风险承受能力和组织的风险承受能力.有62个问题涉及被,通常的P =0.05显着水平被认为是过于严格（有60个问题,第二类错误的预计数为3）.对P值=0.01因此选择的意义的准则.
加权平均得分（WAS）的使用.这是总结计算的响应等级和相应数量的产品和答复除以由答复总数的数字.
Arequ受访者提名为最有利的风险管理培训美国东部时间只生产了11份答复,包括：
内部培训（五回复）
体验（三回复）
工商管理硕士（一响应）
可行性分析（一响应）
学院规划监督员,苏格兰（1回应）
一个承包人说,他们钬榙身份证找不到有用的正规培训的所有钬
加权平均得分（WAS）的使用.这是总结计算的响应等级和相应数量的产品和答复除以由答复总数的数字.
Arequ受访者提名为最有利的风险管理培训美国东部时间只生产了11份答复,包括：
内部培训（五回复）
体验（三回复）
工商管理硕士（一响应）
可行性分析（一响应）
学院规划监督员,苏格兰（1回应）
一个承包人说,他们钬榙身份证找不到有用的正规培训的所有钬