帮我翻译过来,翻译好了我可以追加奖励100分.谢谢啦,越快越好
来源:学生作业帮 编辑:神马作文网作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/09/29 23:36:46
帮我翻译过来,翻译好了我可以追加奖励100分.谢谢啦,越快越好
Table 5 reports bivariate ordered probit estimates under different specifications with the specific intention of trying to
capture league/nation reputation effects. Model (1) includes club nationality fixed effects alongside referee nationality effects.
The inclusion of club nationality results in the team coefficient index becoming insignificant, so it appears that club
effects are capturing some (perhaps, most) of the impact of team quality. The stage of the competition becomes insignificant
in the home team equation and less significant in the away team equation. Champions League matches (home equation and
away equation), the presence of a running track (home equation only), and the relative size of the crowd (in both the home
and away equations) remain important determinants of the incidence of disciplinary sanction.
Model (2) includes all the variables in Model (1) plus three new variables denoting whether the home team, away team or
both teams is from one of the ‘big five’ leagues (England, Italy, Germany, Spain and France). The idea here is to capture possible
‘league reputation’ effects, whereby a team from one of the big five leagues is likely to incur fewer disciplinary points.
As expected, a home team from the ‘big five’ incurs fewer disciplinary points if playing a team from outside the ‘big five’. The
effect is significant for an away team from one of the big five leagues. Also, more disciplinary points are awarded to the home
team and away team if they are both drawn from one of the big five leagues.
Model (2) also includes a dummy variable, capturing whether the referee officiated at the 2004 European Championships
(defined here as an ‘elite’ referee). A positive, and statistically significant, impact is found in the home team equation. Similarly,
a positive impact is found in the away equation but the coefficient is insignificant. A possible interpretation is that elite
referees compensate for inherent (implicit) favouritism by issuing more disciplinary sanctions to the home team, though this
conclusion must be tentative as there may be problems associated with sample selection effects
Table 5 reports bivariate ordered probit estimates under different specifications with the specific intention of trying to
capture league/nation reputation effects. Model (1) includes club nationality fixed effects alongside referee nationality effects.
The inclusion of club nationality results in the team coefficient index becoming insignificant, so it appears that club
effects are capturing some (perhaps, most) of the impact of team quality. The stage of the competition becomes insignificant
in the home team equation and less significant in the away team equation. Champions League matches (home equation and
away equation), the presence of a running track (home equation only), and the relative size of the crowd (in both the home
and away equations) remain important determinants of the incidence of disciplinary sanction.
Model (2) includes all the variables in Model (1) plus three new variables denoting whether the home team, away team or
both teams is from one of the ‘big five’ leagues (England, Italy, Germany, Spain and France). The idea here is to capture possible
‘league reputation’ effects, whereby a team from one of the big five leagues is likely to incur fewer disciplinary points.
As expected, a home team from the ‘big five’ incurs fewer disciplinary points if playing a team from outside the ‘big five’. The
effect is significant for an away team from one of the big five leagues. Also, more disciplinary points are awarded to the home
team and away team if they are both drawn from one of the big five leagues.
Model (2) also includes a dummy variable, capturing whether the referee officiated at the 2004 European Championships
(defined here as an ‘elite’ referee). A positive, and statistically significant, impact is found in the home team equation. Similarly,
a positive impact is found in the away equation but the coefficient is insignificant. A possible interpretation is that elite
referees compensate for inherent (implicit) favouritism by issuing more disciplinary sanctions to the home team, though this
conclusion must be tentative as there may be problems associated with sample selection effects
已经放在你的床上,请查收
英语翻译翻译好了,我给追加100分,
帮我翻译成英文,语法要准确!奖励10分!翻译得好再追加!
英语高手帮我翻译一下,好的话追加奖励80-100,不要翻译器,
英语翻译文件全部在我的百度空间相册翻译里.好了追加分...好了的话..在追加50分.比较多 比较辛苦 谢谢达人门了
帮我翻译一段话,谢谢啦.
帮我写篇作文,写好了追加100分~
帮我翻译一下,谢谢...追加分,很急,在线等,谢谢了.
假如我是班干的作文谁可以帮我搞完这编作文啊,本人要拿这编作文竞选班干的,谁可以帮我搞掂我就谢谢他啦!奖励100分
请英语高手帮我翻译一篇英文文章,小弟感激涕零!好了追分,谢谢了
这个是维语,大家帮我翻译翻译.谢谢啦!
急,谁帮我翻译.追加50分啊.
求高手帮我翻译一首词,正确后追加分